Sex contextualism in laboratory research: Enhancing rigor and precision in the study of sex-related variables

gr2.jpg

Publication information:

Pape, Madeleine, Miriam Miyagi, Stacey A. Ritz, Marion Boulicault, Sarah S. Richardson, and Donna Maney. “Sex Contextualism in Laboratory Research: Enhancing Rigor and Precision in the Study of Sex-Related Variables”. Cell 187, no. 6 (2024): 1316-26.

Abstract

Understanding sex-related variation in health and illness requires rigorous and precise approaches to revealing underlying mechanisms. A first step is to recognize that sex is not in and of itself a causal mechanism; rather, it is a classification system comprising a set of categories, usually assigned according to a range of varying traits. Moving beyond sex as a system of classification to working with concrete and measurable sex-related variables is necessary for precision. Whether and how these sex-related variables matter—and what patterns of difference they contribute to—will vary in context-specific ways. Second, when researchers incorporate these sex-related variables into research designs, rigorous analytical methods are needed to allow strongly supported conclusions. Third, the interpretation and reporting of sex-related variation require care to ensure that basic and preclinical research advance health equity for all.